What Fiction Teaches About Real Resilience | Steve Ysreal Monas
Cuisine

Why We Cook What Our Mothers Cooked

Why We Cook What Our Mothers Cooked — Cuisine article by Steve Ysreal Monas
You can live anywhere in the world. But when you're homesick, you cook what your mother cooked. Here's why.

This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

You can live anywhere in the world. But when you're homesick, you cook what your mother cooked. Here's why.

I live in Hawaii now. My kids are growing up eating poke, spam musubi, and shave ice.

But when I'm tired, stressed, or homesick, I don't crave those things.

I crave the dishes my mother made. The ones her mother taught her. The ones that smell like childhood, taste like memory, and feel like home—even thousands of miles away.

This isn't unique to me. It's universal.

No matter where we go, what we achieve, or how far we travel, we carry our mothers' kitchens with us.

Food as Time Machine

Smell is the sense most closely linked to memory. One whiff of a dish you haven't eaten in years, and suddenly you're eight years old again, sitting at your grandmother's table.

But it's more than nostalgia.

The foods we ate as children shape our palates, our comfort zones, our sense of "normal." Scientists call this food neophobia—the tendency to prefer familiar foods over new ones.

But there's a deeper layer: identity.

When I cook the dishes my mother cooked, I'm not just making dinner. I'm connecting with lineage. I'm preserving culture. I'm saying, "This is who I am. This is where I come from."

The recipe becomes a time machine, a bridge across generations.

What Gets Passed Down

When my mother taught me to cook, she didn't hand me recipes with precise measurements.

She'd say things like:

  • "Add enough water until it looks right."
  • "Season until it tastes like home."
  • "You'll know it's done when it smells like this."

This drove me crazy as a kid. How much is "enough"? What does "right" look like?

But now I understand: she was teaching intuition, not formulas.

Traditional cooking isn't about precision. It's about feel. You learn by watching, tasting, adjusting. You develop muscle memory. You recognize the exact moment when the spices bloom in hot oil, or when the dough has been kneaded enough.

This knowledge can't be written down. It has to be experienced.

And that's the point. Cooking with your mother isn't just skill transfer—it's intimacy. It's time together. It's conversation while stirring. It's stories between chopping.

The recipe is the excuse. The relationship is the real inheritance.

The Adaptation Story

Every immigrant family has food stories.

My mother's generation came to new countries and couldn't find the ingredients they needed. So they adapted.

Cassava became potato. One type of pepper substituted for another. Spices were blended differently. Traditional cooking methods were modified for new kitchens.

Purists might say this "diluted" the cuisine. But I think it shows resilience.

Food cultures have always evolved through migration, trade, and necessity. Italian tomato sauce wouldn't exist without New World tomatoes. Indian curry traveled to Britain and transformed into chicken tikka masala. Japanese ramen has Chinese roots.

Cuisine isn't static. It's a living thing that adapts while keeping its soul intact.

When my mother couldn't find the exact ingredient, she'd taste, adjust, and make it work. The dish was different—but it still meant the same thing.

That's the magic: the meaning transcends the ingredients.

Cooking as Resistance

There's a political dimension to this that often goes unspoken.

When colonizers, slavers, or oppressive regimes tried to erase cultures, food was one of the few things people could hold onto.

You could take away land, language, religion, clothing. But you couldn't prevent people from cooking what their ancestors cooked—even in secret, even with substitutions, even when it was dangerous.

Enslaved Africans brought to the Americas maintained culinary traditions using whatever ingredients were available. That's how soul food, Creole cuisine, and Caribbean cooking were born—adaptations born of necessity, but still carrying ancestral memory.

Indigenous communities maintained their food ways despite systemic attempts to assimilate them. Native American fry bread, for example, emerged from government rations but became a symbol of survival and identity.

Jewish families kept kosher traditions alive through diaspora and persecution.

Food became resistance. Cooking what your mother cooked was an act of defiance: You can take everything else, but you can't take this.

The Gender Dimension

There's a reason we say "mother's cooking" and not "parent's cooking."

In most cultures, women have been the keepers of culinary knowledge. Not because of biology, but because of social roles.

This created both burden and power.

On one hand, women's labor in the kitchen has often been undervalued, unpaid, and taken for granted.

On the other hand, the kitchen became a domain where women held expertise, made decisions, and passed down knowledge that men often didn't access.

My mother couldn't pass me a family business or inheritance. But she could pass me recipes. Skills. Stories told while we cooked together.

In that sense, traditional cooking is one of the few matrilineal inheritances many cultures have. Grandmothers to mothers to daughters (and increasingly, sons).

When I cook with my own children now, I'm aware I'm part of that chain. The recipes I teach them aren't just "how to make food." They're who we are.

What Gets Lost

Here's the uncomfortable truth: with every generation, something is lost.

My grandmother knew techniques my mother never fully learned. My mother knows dishes I've never mastered. My kids will grow up with Hawaiian-influenced palates and may not crave the foods that define "home" to me.

This is natural. Cultures evolve. Children create their own identities.

But there's also genuine loss.

When the last person who knows how to make a particular dish dies, that knowledge can disappear. Entire regional cuisines have vanished because they weren't written down and the keepers of that knowledge passed away.

This is why I wrote Flavors of the Motherland—not as a cookbook, but as cultural preservation. To document not just recipes, but the why behind them. The history. The meaning.

Because once it's gone, it's gone.

Cooking in Diaspora

For people living far from their homeland, food becomes even more significant.

When you can't visit home, you recreate it in your kitchen.

When your children are growing up disconnected from your culture, you teach them through food.

When you're the only person from your country in your city, cooking becomes how you hold onto yourself.

I've met immigrants who spend hours hunting for specific ingredients in ethnic markets three cities away. Who pay premium prices for imports. Who grow their own herbs because they can't find them locally.

This isn't just about taste preference. It's about identity maintenance.

Every meal becomes a small act of cultural preservation.

The Globalization Paradox

We live in an era where you can get Thai food in Iowa, Mexican food in Tokyo, and Indian food in rural Norway.

On one hand, this is amazing. Culinary exchange enriches everyone. I love that my kids can grow up eating diverse cuisines.

On the other hand, something is lost when food becomes disconnected from context.

When you eat pad thai from a chain restaurant designed by a marketing team, you're not experiencing Thai culture. You're experiencing a corporate approximation designed for mass appeal.

The rough edges are smoothed. The challenging flavors are toned down. The story is erased.

Real food—the kind mothers cook—is messy. It's imprecise. It varies by region, family, and individual cook. It carries history you can't package.

That's what makes it real. And that's what globalization often strips away in the name of consistency.

Teaching the Next Generation

My kids are growing up in a different world than I did.

They have access to every cuisine imaginable. They can watch YouTube tutorials from chefs worldwide. They can order ingredients from anywhere.

But they won't have what I had: afternoons in my mother's kitchen, watching, tasting, learning through repetition.

So I have to be intentional.

I bring them into the kitchen. I show them how to make the dishes my mother made. I tell them the stories while we cook.

"This is what your great-grandmother made during hard times."

"This is the dish we eat for celebrations."

"This is how you know it's ready."

Some of it sticks. Some doesn't. That's okay.

The goal isn't perfection. It's connection.

If they grow up and remember even a few dishes, a few stories, a few moments standing next to me in the kitchen—that's the chain continuing.

Why It Matters

In a world that moves fast, values efficiency, and optimizes everything, cooking what your mother cooked is an act of slowing down.

It says: some things can't be rushed. Some knowledge can't be Googled. Some experiences require presence.

It says: I value where I came from. I honor the people who came before me. I'm part of something larger than myself.

It says: this matters enough to preserve.

We live in an age of cultural amnesia. Traditions are discarded as "outdated." Ancestral knowledge is dismissed as "inefficient." Connection to heritage is seen as optional.

But when you cook what your mother cooked, you're saying: This isn't optional. This is who I am.

The Recipe You Can't Write Down

Here's what no recipe book can capture:

The way your mother's hands moved when she kneaded dough.

The specific sound the pot makes when the sauce is ready.

The smell that tells you it's done, even before you taste it.

The muscle memory of the exact pressure needed to chop vegetables the way she did.

The stories she told while cooking, stories you'll never tell exactly the same way.

This is the invisible inheritance. The knowledge that lives in bodies, not books.

And it's why, no matter how many cookbooks exist, nothing will ever taste exactly like your mother's version.

Because her version carried her hands, her voice, her presence.

When you cook it now, you're not just following a recipe. You're channeling memory. You're honoring lineage. You're keeping her alive.

The Invitation

If your mother is still alive, call her. Ask her to teach you a dish.

Not over the phone. Not from a recipe card. In person, in the kitchen, side by side.

Watch her hands. Ask questions. Taste as you go. Make mistakes. Laugh together.

Write down what you can. But know that the most important parts can't be written.

If your mother is gone, cook the dishes she made. Let the smell bring her back, even for a moment. Teach them to someone else. Keep the chain alive.

And if you have children, bring them into the kitchen. Even if they don't seem interested. Even if they'd rather be on their phones. Even if they complain.

One day, they'll be far from home, tired and homesick, and they'll remember standing next to you, learning how to make the thing that tastes like comfort.

And they'll cook it.

And they'll understand.


For more on food as identity, heritage, and cultural connection, explore Flavors of the Motherland—stories of how we carry our ancestors with us, one meal at a time.

📬 Enjoyed this post? Subscribe to my newsletter for more reflections on culture, heritage, and the connections that define us. Sign up here.

More Articles

Cuisine

The Story Behind Threads of Resilience

Read More
Cuisine

Micro-Habits That Changed My Life

Read More
← Back to All Posts

You May Also Like